1 00:00:03,669 --> 00:00:01,670 associate administrator for research in 2 00:00:05,990 --> 00:00:03,679 the science mission directorate and we 3 00:00:08,390 --> 00:00:06,000 have david spurgle who will be the lead 4 00:00:10,549 --> 00:00:08,400 for this study and also the president of 5 00:00:11,910 --> 00:00:10,559 the simons foundation 6 00:00:14,230 --> 00:00:11,920 once we get to the question and answer 7 00:00:16,710 --> 00:00:14,240 portion you may press star one to get 8 00:00:18,070 --> 00:00:16,720 into the queue to ask a question and our 9 00:00:20,550 --> 00:00:18,080 operator holly will give you more 10 00:00:24,070 --> 00:00:20,560 details when we get to that point uh 11 00:00:26,550 --> 00:00:24,080 however for now we will start out and uh 12 00:00:28,630 --> 00:00:26,560 welcome thomas sirbukin talking to you 13 00:00:30,950 --> 00:00:28,640 well thanks so much karen 14 00:00:32,630 --> 00:00:30,960 i want to first uh say that of course 15 00:00:34,790 --> 00:00:32,640 part of our 16 00:00:36,229 --> 00:00:34,800 task at nasa is 17 00:00:38,389 --> 00:00:36,239 given to us by 18 00:00:40,709 --> 00:00:38,399 the congress is not only to do 19 00:00:42,709 --> 00:00:40,719 fundamental research in the skies and so 20 00:00:45,110 --> 00:00:42,719 forth but as part of that also to find 21 00:00:47,029 --> 00:00:45,120 life elsewhere that's why we've built 22 00:00:49,670 --> 00:00:47,039 astrobiology programs in many 23 00:00:52,310 --> 00:00:49,680 disciplines across the summary field 24 00:00:55,029 --> 00:00:52,320 that looks at both 25 00:00:57,350 --> 00:00:55,039 extinct life on mars for example but 26 00:00:58,869 --> 00:00:57,360 also looks at the patterns of life 27 00:01:00,150 --> 00:00:58,879 elsewhere 28 00:01:04,310 --> 00:01:00,160 perhaps 29 00:01:06,870 --> 00:01:04,320 forward but also as we look at 30 00:01:09,190 --> 00:01:06,880 exoplanets planets outside of our solar 31 00:01:12,230 --> 00:01:09,200 system looking for the question whether 32 00:01:13,910 --> 00:01:12,240 certain environments are in fact uh 33 00:01:15,749 --> 00:01:13,920 part of uh 34 00:01:16,870 --> 00:01:15,759 ken of the if you want the ladder of 35 00:01:19,270 --> 00:01:16,880 life that 36 00:01:20,870 --> 00:01:19,280 got us to uh where we are 37 00:01:22,630 --> 00:01:20,880 so the tools that we're using whether 38 00:01:24,630 --> 00:01:22,640 it's in this field they're also kind of 39 00:01:26,710 --> 00:01:24,640 in fields that then go towards kind of 40 00:01:28,870 --> 00:01:26,720 intelligent life such as techno 41 00:01:31,190 --> 00:01:28,880 signatures which we have programs for 42 00:01:33,350 --> 00:01:31,200 already are the same tools that we use 43 00:01:35,270 --> 00:01:33,360 everywhere the tools that we're uh 44 00:01:36,870 --> 00:01:35,280 frankly using here and that is to be 45 00:01:39,190 --> 00:01:36,880 commissioning a study 46 00:01:41,670 --> 00:01:39,200 uh to start early in the fall to examine 47 00:01:43,590 --> 00:01:41,680 our unidentified aerial phenomena the 48 00:01:45,910 --> 00:01:43,600 study will focus 49 00:01:48,630 --> 00:01:45,920 on identifying available data how to 50 00:01:50,149 --> 00:01:48,640 best collect future data and how nasa 51 00:01:53,030 --> 00:01:50,159 can use these data to move the 52 00:01:54,789 --> 00:01:53,040 scientific understanding of uaps forward 53 00:01:57,190 --> 00:01:54,799 a short way i would talk about that is 54 00:01:58,789 --> 00:01:57,200 take a field that is relatively data 55 00:02:00,950 --> 00:01:58,799 poor 56 00:02:03,670 --> 00:02:00,960 and to have make it into a field that is 57 00:02:06,630 --> 00:02:03,680 much more data rich and therefore worthy 58 00:02:08,949 --> 00:02:06,640 of scientific investigation and analysis 59 00:02:10,949 --> 00:02:08,959 as its mission of course uh as i just 60 00:02:12,150 --> 00:02:10,959 said is to explore the unknown in air 61 00:02:13,910 --> 00:02:12,160 and space 62 00:02:16,710 --> 00:02:13,920 and we have access frankly as part of 63 00:02:19,430 --> 00:02:16,720 that to broad a range of observations uh 64 00:02:21,350 --> 00:02:19,440 of earth and space and and frankly 65 00:02:23,830 --> 00:02:21,360 that's the lifeblood of our scientific 66 00:02:25,990 --> 00:02:23,840 inquiry we have the tools 67 00:02:28,070 --> 00:02:26,000 and teams who can help us improve our 68 00:02:30,630 --> 00:02:28,080 understanding of the unknown and we are 69 00:02:33,190 --> 00:02:30,640 prepared to use these powerful tools 70 00:02:35,830 --> 00:02:33,200 of scientific discovery in this case 71 00:02:37,030 --> 00:02:35,840 as much as anything else using exactly 72 00:02:40,150 --> 00:02:37,040 the same 73 00:02:42,150 --> 00:02:40,160 kind of approach that we always use 74 00:02:45,350 --> 00:02:42,160 unidentified phenomena in the atmosphere 75 00:02:47,910 --> 00:02:45,360 of interest for both for many reasons 76 00:02:49,270 --> 00:02:47,920 frankly i think there's new science to 77 00:02:50,869 --> 00:02:49,280 be discovered 78 00:02:52,630 --> 00:02:50,879 there's many many times where something 79 00:02:55,110 --> 00:02:52,640 that looked almost magical turned out to 80 00:02:57,030 --> 00:02:55,120 be a new scientific effect 81 00:02:59,110 --> 00:02:57,040 but there's also 82 00:03:01,350 --> 00:02:59,120 national security and air safety issues 83 00:03:03,830 --> 00:03:01,360 that have been discussed elsewhere that 84 00:03:06,390 --> 00:03:03,840 of course relate to these observations 85 00:03:08,630 --> 00:03:06,400 and establishing uh uh you know with 86 00:03:11,270 --> 00:03:08,640 events that are whether they're natural 87 00:03:13,110 --> 00:03:11,280 or whether they are kind of uh need to 88 00:03:15,830 --> 00:03:13,120 be explained otherwise 89 00:03:18,149 --> 00:03:15,840 is very much aligned with nasa's goals 90 00:03:20,229 --> 00:03:18,159 that uh ensure of course you know that 91 00:03:21,910 --> 00:03:20,239 we discover the unknown but also ensures 92 00:03:23,670 --> 00:03:21,920 the safety of aircraft that of course 93 00:03:26,070 --> 00:03:23,680 are in that airspace 94 00:03:27,750 --> 00:03:26,080 that these phenomena occur 95 00:03:30,229 --> 00:03:27,760 uh this an abandoned study will be led 96 00:03:31,589 --> 00:03:30,239 by astrophysicist david spurgle 97 00:03:34,789 --> 00:03:31,599 who's the president of the simons 98 00:03:36,789 --> 00:03:34,799 foundation of uh in new york city and uh 99 00:03:38,550 --> 00:03:36,799 as previous previously been the chair of 100 00:03:41,110 --> 00:03:38,560 astrophysics and department of branston 101 00:03:42,949 --> 00:03:41,120 and university of princeton new jersey 102 00:03:45,190 --> 00:03:42,959 dan evans the assistant deputy associate 103 00:03:47,030 --> 00:03:45,200 uh administrator for research it's kind 104 00:03:48,550 --> 00:03:47,040 of is that the really kind of the wheels 105 00:03:50,229 --> 00:03:48,560 on the bus kind of really making sure 106 00:03:52,949 --> 00:03:50,239 that we're interfacing 107 00:03:54,789 --> 00:03:52,959 uh with some people may ask why david by 108 00:03:57,110 --> 00:03:54,799 dance first of all dan 109 00:03:59,110 --> 00:03:57,120 with his tremendous experience uh both 110 00:04:00,710 --> 00:03:59,120 as a researcher but also as enabler for 111 00:04:02,229 --> 00:04:00,720 research his work that he did in the 112 00:04:04,869 --> 00:04:02,239 white house previously i think has 113 00:04:07,509 --> 00:04:04,879 tremendous uh insight into kind of the 114 00:04:09,509 --> 00:04:07,519 cross interagency aspect that uh relates 115 00:04:11,750 --> 00:04:09,519 to some of these discussions 116 00:04:13,589 --> 00:04:11,760 and david sperkle i think to all of us 117 00:04:15,509 --> 00:04:13,599 in astrophysics really understand that 118 00:04:18,150 --> 00:04:15,519 he's one of the most trusted voices and 119 00:04:19,909 --> 00:04:18,160 so many questions also a person who 120 00:04:21,990 --> 00:04:19,919 understands really the power of science 121 00:04:24,469 --> 00:04:22,000 and is willing and able to use that 122 00:04:26,310 --> 00:04:24,479 power of science kind of in areas 123 00:04:28,150 --> 00:04:26,320 where i would say kind of fall under 124 00:04:29,990 --> 00:04:28,160 that what we would refer to as high risk 125 00:04:31,270 --> 00:04:30,000 high impact kind of research kind of 126 00:04:33,189 --> 00:04:31,280 areas that 127 00:04:34,710 --> 00:04:33,199 that many of the scientists may be a 128 00:04:36,230 --> 00:04:34,720 little bit more timid 129 00:04:38,469 --> 00:04:36,240 to walk into so dave i'm going to kick 130 00:04:40,070 --> 00:04:38,479 it over to you 131 00:04:41,430 --> 00:04:40,080 uh thanks thomas 132 00:04:44,550 --> 00:04:41,440 to 133 00:04:46,230 --> 00:04:44,560 start this is a really exciting project 134 00:04:47,909 --> 00:04:46,240 one of the most exciting things in 135 00:04:49,590 --> 00:04:47,919 science are things that we don't 136 00:04:50,870 --> 00:04:49,600 understand 137 00:04:52,550 --> 00:04:50,880 and 138 00:04:56,629 --> 00:04:52,560 my starting point i think all of our 139 00:05:00,710 --> 00:04:58,790 this is they're a phenomenon that we 140 00:05:02,710 --> 00:05:00,720 don't understand and have and then how 141 00:05:04,230 --> 00:05:02,720 do we start to make progress 142 00:05:06,870 --> 00:05:04,240 we have a very limited set of 143 00:05:08,390 --> 00:05:06,880 observations right now with these uaps 144 00:05:09,670 --> 00:05:08,400 this makes it difficult to draw 145 00:05:12,790 --> 00:05:09,680 conclusions 146 00:05:15,510 --> 00:05:12,800 so we start by trying to 147 00:05:18,870 --> 00:05:15,520 figure out what data is out there 148 00:05:21,350 --> 00:05:18,880 and we're going to be working with 149 00:05:24,310 --> 00:05:21,360 government nonprofits companies 150 00:05:26,550 --> 00:05:24,320 civilians and try to identify what data 151 00:05:28,390 --> 00:05:26,560 is already there 152 00:05:30,629 --> 00:05:28,400 then start to think about what data 153 00:05:34,230 --> 00:05:30,639 should we collect in the future 154 00:05:38,310 --> 00:05:34,240 and how are we going to analyze it 155 00:05:40,790 --> 00:05:38,320 we actually have a wealth of data about 156 00:05:43,110 --> 00:05:40,800 our atmosphere right we observe it 157 00:05:44,230 --> 00:05:43,120 both from above and below 158 00:05:48,070 --> 00:05:44,240 and 159 00:05:51,189 --> 00:05:48,080 whether it's air traffic management data 160 00:05:53,430 --> 00:05:51,199 astronomers looking up 161 00:05:55,510 --> 00:05:53,440 sunlight's looking down and what we want 162 00:05:57,029 --> 00:05:55,520 to start with is just synthesizing the 163 00:05:59,590 --> 00:05:57,039 data we have 164 00:06:01,909 --> 00:05:59,600 and see what information we have and see 165 00:06:05,029 --> 00:06:01,919 what information we need 166 00:06:07,029 --> 00:06:05,039 and our plan is to conduct a you know an 167 00:06:08,150 --> 00:06:07,039 open inquiry 168 00:06:16,790 --> 00:06:08,160 that 169 00:06:19,350 --> 00:06:16,800 this is done we at least have a roadmap 170 00:06:20,950 --> 00:06:19,360 of how to move forward in understanding 171 00:06:22,790 --> 00:06:20,960 in this area 172 00:06:25,189 --> 00:06:22,800 um so let me now turn this over to dan 173 00:06:28,390 --> 00:06:25,199 adams who will talk a bit more about the 174 00:06:32,469 --> 00:06:30,309 thanks david hello everyone i'm going to 175 00:06:34,629 --> 00:06:32,479 give you some quick details on this 176 00:06:36,390 --> 00:06:34,639 study from a nasa perspective 177 00:06:39,110 --> 00:06:36,400 but i wanted to start by saying that 178 00:06:40,550 --> 00:06:39,120 over the decades nasa has answered the 179 00:06:42,550 --> 00:06:40,560 call to tackle some of the most 180 00:06:44,710 --> 00:06:42,560 perplexing mysteries we know of and this 181 00:06:46,950 --> 00:06:44,720 is no different i do want to underscore 182 00:06:49,749 --> 00:06:46,960 that nasa is uniquely positioned to 183 00:06:52,309 --> 00:06:49,759 address uap because who other than us 184 00:06:54,230 --> 00:06:52,319 can use the power of data and of science 185 00:06:56,950 --> 00:06:54,240 to look at what's happening in our skies 186 00:06:58,150 --> 00:06:56,960 and quite frankly this is why we do 187 00:07:00,469 --> 00:06:58,160 what we do 188 00:07:01,670 --> 00:07:00,479 now for this study specifically we plan 189 00:07:04,150 --> 00:07:01,680 on bringing together some of the 190 00:07:06,550 --> 00:07:04,160 country's leading scientists aeronautics 191 00:07:08,230 --> 00:07:06,560 experts and data practitioners 192 00:07:09,990 --> 00:07:08,240 we expect the study to kick off in the 193 00:07:11,589 --> 00:07:10,000 early fall it should take about nine 194 00:07:13,029 --> 00:07:11,599 months to complete 195 00:07:15,350 --> 00:07:13,039 and i want to make this point 196 00:07:17,589 --> 00:07:15,360 emphatically that very much consistent 197 00:07:20,469 --> 00:07:17,599 with our principles of openness 198 00:07:22,070 --> 00:07:20,479 transparency and scientific integrity 199 00:07:24,070 --> 00:07:22,080 the full report will be 200 00:07:25,990 --> 00:07:24,080 made available to the public and we 201 00:07:28,790 --> 00:07:26,000 expect to hold a public meeting to 202 00:07:32,870 --> 00:07:28,800 discuss the study's findings without 203 00:07:35,589 --> 00:07:32,880 that i will pass it back to karen fox 204 00:07:38,790 --> 00:07:35,599 fantastic thank you we are ready to take 205 00:07:42,309 --> 00:07:38,800 questions and i will pass it to uh holly 206 00:07:43,990 --> 00:07:42,319 our operator just to i walk us through 207 00:07:44,869 --> 00:07:44,000 the process there 208 00:07:47,909 --> 00:07:44,879 and 209 00:07:51,589 --> 00:07:49,749 thank you if you would like to ask a 210 00:07:53,510 --> 00:07:51,599 question please unmute your phone press 211 00:07:55,270 --> 00:07:53,520 star one and record your first and last 212 00:07:56,469 --> 00:07:55,280 name clearly when prompted so i may 213 00:07:58,710 --> 00:07:56,479 introduce you 214 00:08:00,869 --> 00:07:58,720 again that is star one our first 215 00:08:02,790 --> 00:08:00,879 question comes from chris davenport with 216 00:08:04,550 --> 00:08:02,800 the washington post 217 00:08:07,189 --> 00:08:04,560 you may go ahead 218 00:08:09,830 --> 00:08:07,199 okay thanks very much um i just wonder 219 00:08:13,110 --> 00:08:09,840 uh for david dr z i mean do you go into 220 00:08:15,749 --> 00:08:13,120 this study with any sort of hypothesis 221 00:08:17,990 --> 00:08:15,759 that could explain the uaps and then 222 00:08:19,589 --> 00:08:18,000 also dr z during your speech 223 00:08:22,150 --> 00:08:19,599 this morning you said you didn't want to 224 00:08:24,790 --> 00:08:22,160 shy away from these types of studies 225 00:08:27,189 --> 00:08:24,800 even if they're controversial or 226 00:08:29,350 --> 00:08:27,199 you could uh as you i think you said you 227 00:08:30,629 --> 00:08:29,360 know cause some sort of reputational 228 00:08:32,230 --> 00:08:30,639 harm i wonder if you can talk a little 229 00:08:35,430 --> 00:08:32,240 bit more about that and if you expect 230 00:08:42,870 --> 00:08:35,440 any kind of pushback thanks 231 00:08:48,070 --> 00:08:44,070 david are you there can you take the 232 00:08:51,350 --> 00:08:49,750 yeah can you hear me now 233 00:08:52,710 --> 00:08:51,360 yeah yes 234 00:08:55,350 --> 00:08:52,720 excellent 235 00:08:57,590 --> 00:08:55,360 uh so yeah so 236 00:09:00,310 --> 00:08:57,600 i would say the only preconceived notion 237 00:09:01,990 --> 00:09:00,320 i have coming into this is that we 238 00:09:05,110 --> 00:09:02,000 should be open to the idea that we're 239 00:09:07,030 --> 00:09:05,120 looking at several different phenomena 240 00:09:09,030 --> 00:09:07,040 this has been 241 00:09:10,949 --> 00:09:09,040 my experience when we have some 242 00:09:13,110 --> 00:09:10,959 observational phenomena we don't know 243 00:09:14,710 --> 00:09:13,120 what it is that we classify 244 00:09:15,910 --> 00:09:14,720 several different things into one 245 00:09:18,150 --> 00:09:15,920 grouping 246 00:09:20,310 --> 00:09:18,160 so we need not look for you know we may 247 00:09:22,710 --> 00:09:20,320 find that one explanation accounts for 248 00:09:25,269 --> 00:09:22,720 some set of events and a different 249 00:09:26,710 --> 00:09:25,279 explanation accounts for others 250 00:09:28,389 --> 00:09:26,720 so i you know 251 00:09:31,509 --> 00:09:28,399 there's a pretty wide range of what 252 00:09:33,829 --> 00:09:31,519 might be accounting for these events and 253 00:09:38,790 --> 00:09:35,590 i have not looked 254 00:09:40,389 --> 00:09:38,800 at all the data that's available and 255 00:09:42,550 --> 00:09:40,399 believe in 256 00:09:44,150 --> 00:09:42,560 trying to not come in with preconceived 257 00:09:47,030 --> 00:09:44,160 notions until we have a better look at 258 00:09:50,710 --> 00:09:49,190 so if you ask me that question uh 259 00:09:52,550 --> 00:09:50,720 frankly david i would have i would have 260 00:09:54,949 --> 00:09:52,560 said almost the same thing you know i 261 00:09:58,790 --> 00:09:54,959 really believe uh generally speaking 262 00:10:01,269 --> 00:09:58,800 uh my sense is that uh don't ever 263 00:10:03,190 --> 00:10:01,279 underestimate what nature can do for you 264 00:10:04,949 --> 00:10:03,200 uh i just really believe the natural 265 00:10:06,550 --> 00:10:04,959 world kind of sometimes we have this 266 00:10:07,590 --> 00:10:06,560 assertion that we understand the natural 267 00:10:10,870 --> 00:10:07,600 world and everything that's not 268 00:10:13,190 --> 00:10:10,880 explained in the with the loss of nature 269 00:10:15,509 --> 00:10:13,200 that we have right now is somehow not 270 00:10:17,750 --> 00:10:15,519 natural and i just uh really believe 271 00:10:19,430 --> 00:10:17,760 that there's a lot to learn still 272 00:10:21,670 --> 00:10:19,440 we learned that frankly as we turn 273 00:10:23,910 --> 00:10:21,680 around we put up telescopes look into 274 00:10:25,269 --> 00:10:23,920 the deep sky there's a lot to learn 275 00:10:27,910 --> 00:10:25,279 and i think the same is true when we 276 00:10:29,829 --> 00:10:27,920 look at our own planet and even our own 277 00:10:31,509 --> 00:10:29,839 airspace 278 00:10:35,269 --> 00:10:31,519 the reason i talked about kind of 279 00:10:36,870 --> 00:10:35,279 reputational risk uh relative to that 280 00:10:38,310 --> 00:10:36,880 i mean it's clear 281 00:10:40,310 --> 00:10:38,320 that you know 282 00:10:42,389 --> 00:10:40,320 in a traditional type of science 283 00:10:45,110 --> 00:10:42,399 environment kind of talking about some 284 00:10:46,790 --> 00:10:45,120 of these issues may be considered kind 285 00:10:52,470 --> 00:10:46,800 of 286 00:10:54,949 --> 00:10:52,480 things that are not actual science i 287 00:10:56,630 --> 00:10:54,959 just really vehemently oppose that i 288 00:10:58,710 --> 00:10:56,640 really believe that 289 00:11:00,949 --> 00:10:58,720 the quality of science is not only 290 00:11:03,030 --> 00:11:00,959 measured by the outputs that come behind 291 00:11:04,870 --> 00:11:03,040 it but also the questions we're willing 292 00:11:07,350 --> 00:11:04,880 to tackle with science 293 00:11:08,710 --> 00:11:07,360 this of course is the reason why 294 00:11:10,870 --> 00:11:08,720 millions of 295 00:11:12,550 --> 00:11:10,880 lives were saved 296 00:11:14,470 --> 00:11:12,560 during this pandemic because of the 297 00:11:17,750 --> 00:11:14,480 amazing scientists that looked at new 298 00:11:18,710 --> 00:11:17,760 ways of creating kind of vaccines before 299 00:11:21,110 --> 00:11:18,720 they were 300 00:11:23,269 --> 00:11:21,120 truly uh useful and then them being 301 00:11:25,030 --> 00:11:23,279 deployed there's many many examples that 302 00:11:27,430 --> 00:11:25,040 were where people 303 00:11:30,389 --> 00:11:27,440 kind of lean forward into a field that 304 00:11:33,350 --> 00:11:30,399 is uh not yet accepted it's 305 00:11:36,389 --> 00:11:33,360 controversial or attacks on reputational 306 00:11:40,310 --> 00:11:36,399 risk so i do believe uh uh you know in 307 00:11:42,069 --> 00:11:40,320 in some domains uh uh surely uh you know 308 00:11:45,030 --> 00:11:42,079 this will not just be met with other 309 00:11:47,269 --> 00:11:45,040 enthusiasm uh but i do believe that uh 310 00:11:49,350 --> 00:11:47,279 it's absolutely necessary uh for us 311 00:11:52,150 --> 00:11:49,360 whether it's in this but also in other 312 00:11:54,230 --> 00:11:52,160 places to really uh in fact lean into uh 313 00:11:56,870 --> 00:11:54,240 those kind of high-risk high-impact kind 314 00:11:58,389 --> 00:11:56,880 of uh areas 315 00:11:59,910 --> 00:11:58,399 yeah and that's just to add a little bit 316 00:12:02,230 --> 00:11:59,920 i think we have to approach all these 317 00:12:03,030 --> 00:12:02,240 questions with a sense of humility 318 00:12:18,710 --> 00:12:03,040 i 319 00:12:20,949 --> 00:12:18,720 but 320 00:12:23,110 --> 00:12:20,959 at the end of the day we may conclude 321 00:12:24,550 --> 00:12:23,120 that we still don't understand many 322 00:12:26,949 --> 00:12:24,560 aspects of them 323 00:12:33,750 --> 00:12:26,959 and perhaps have a road map on how to 324 00:12:37,509 --> 00:12:34,790 all right i think we're ready for our 325 00:12:39,509 --> 00:12:37,519 next question thank you so much 326 00:12:42,790 --> 00:12:39,519 our next question is from lauren gresh 327 00:12:45,030 --> 00:12:42,800 with the verge you may go ahead 328 00:12:47,350 --> 00:12:45,040 hi thank you uh my question is for 329 00:12:49,030 --> 00:12:47,360 thomas derbugen kind of 330 00:12:52,310 --> 00:12:49,040 piggybacking off of what christian was 331 00:12:55,110 --> 00:12:52,320 asking so in the announcement today nasa 332 00:12:57,590 --> 00:12:55,120 stressed that uips are unlikely to be 333 00:12:59,509 --> 00:12:57,600 extraterrestrial in origin but then 334 00:13:01,829 --> 00:12:59,519 proceeded to talk about nasa's efforts 335 00:13:03,430 --> 00:13:01,839 to search for alien life and then today 336 00:13:05,750 --> 00:13:03,440 opening this pressure you talked about 337 00:13:07,430 --> 00:13:05,760 intelligent life and techno signatures 338 00:13:09,350 --> 00:13:07,440 so i'm wondering if nasa is trying to 339 00:13:11,910 --> 00:13:09,360 make a connection that uips or some kind 340 00:13:14,710 --> 00:13:11,920 of alien technology and if not why 341 00:13:17,430 --> 00:13:14,720 include that language thank you 342 00:13:19,110 --> 00:13:17,440 yeah i think what the intent was uh in 343 00:13:24,389 --> 00:13:19,120 that 344 00:13:26,629 --> 00:13:24,399 at this moment in time kind of there's 345 00:13:28,310 --> 00:13:26,639 uh kind of in with the evidence that we 346 00:13:30,470 --> 00:13:28,320 have you know if you looked at the 347 00:13:32,550 --> 00:13:30,480 broader scientific community and also in 348 00:13:35,030 --> 00:13:32,560 general i think it would be hard to find 349 00:13:37,350 --> 00:13:35,040 irrefutable evidence for a given event 350 00:13:40,069 --> 00:13:37,360 being one or the other and certainly uh 351 00:13:43,030 --> 00:13:40,079 there's no kind of marquee event that 352 00:13:45,030 --> 00:13:43,040 anybody kind of a whole group of uh kind 353 00:13:46,310 --> 00:13:45,040 of independent scientists and so forth 354 00:13:48,550 --> 00:13:46,320 which of course as you know is the 355 00:13:49,910 --> 00:13:48,560 standard of scientific consensus would 356 00:13:52,629 --> 00:13:49,920 agree that it's 357 00:13:54,550 --> 00:13:52,639 uh you know it's it's of that nature 358 00:13:56,629 --> 00:13:54,560 i do believe that that actually says 359 00:13:57,990 --> 00:13:56,639 very little about the event themselves 360 00:14:00,790 --> 00:13:58,000 it just says 361 00:14:03,350 --> 00:14:00,800 a lot about the availability of data 362 00:14:06,069 --> 00:14:03,360 which is by the way exactly where 363 00:14:09,030 --> 00:14:06,079 we're focused on this uh the reason i 364 00:14:11,670 --> 00:14:09,040 pointed out uh the uh astrobiology and 365 00:14:13,990 --> 00:14:11,680 techno signatures is to just uh throw 366 00:14:16,069 --> 00:14:14,000 out and many people miss that sometimes 367 00:14:18,230 --> 00:14:16,079 you know kind of you know and people 368 00:14:20,150 --> 00:14:18,240 tweet at me and it's obvious that they 369 00:14:23,110 --> 00:14:20,160 don't know that that we 370 00:14:25,910 --> 00:14:23,120 have demonstrated over the past years 371 00:14:28,550 --> 00:14:25,920 and uh frankly even decades our uh 372 00:14:31,269 --> 00:14:28,560 interest in the overall question of 373 00:14:33,110 --> 00:14:31,279 finding life elsewhere and also finding 374 00:14:34,870 --> 00:14:33,120 intelligent life elsewhere using the 375 00:14:37,110 --> 00:14:34,880 tools of science so that's why i brought 376 00:14:38,389 --> 00:14:37,120 it up i i if somebody asked me do i 377 00:14:40,790 --> 00:14:38,399 really think that 378 00:14:43,430 --> 00:14:40,800 that uh is is that you know there is uh 379 00:14:45,750 --> 00:14:43,440 irrefutable evidence for an intelligent 380 00:14:48,069 --> 00:14:45,760 life here and one of these phenomena and 381 00:14:49,829 --> 00:14:48,079 otherwise that it's a i would give an 382 00:14:51,110 --> 00:14:49,839 answer that's absolutely acceptable as a 383 00:14:53,269 --> 00:14:51,120 scientist 384 00:14:55,509 --> 00:14:53,279 which is i don't know 385 00:14:57,509 --> 00:14:55,519 because there is not you know from where 386 00:14:59,670 --> 00:14:57,519 i'm looking at kind of 387 00:15:00,550 --> 00:14:59,680 uh that's not what uh you know kind of 388 00:15:02,710 --> 00:15:00,560 the 389 00:15:04,310 --> 00:15:02,720 overall kind of uh support for that to 390 00:15:06,470 --> 00:15:04,320 kind of get to that part it's just a 391 00:15:07,829 --> 00:15:06,480 very high bar in all cases i think 392 00:15:09,829 --> 00:15:07,839 additional data 393 00:15:12,710 --> 00:15:09,839 will really bring us uh kind of to 394 00:15:14,629 --> 00:15:12,720 getting uh get learning a lot more uh 395 00:15:16,550 --> 00:15:14,639 how much closer we get to answering that 396 00:15:17,829 --> 00:15:16,560 question as david just said it's 397 00:15:19,350 --> 00:15:17,839 something we don't know yet you need to 398 00:15:22,550 --> 00:15:19,360 do the research before you can answer 399 00:15:26,470 --> 00:15:24,069 thank you we'll move on to the next 400 00:15:31,269 --> 00:15:26,480 question 401 00:15:33,350 --> 00:15:31,279 with space news you may go ahead 402 00:15:35,189 --> 00:15:33,360 good afternoon a couple of procedural 403 00:15:37,269 --> 00:15:35,199 questions about the study 404 00:15:38,629 --> 00:15:37,279 what's the process going to be for 405 00:15:40,949 --> 00:15:38,639 picking the team that's going to be 406 00:15:43,430 --> 00:15:40,959 working on the study and then what's the 407 00:15:45,269 --> 00:15:43,440 the budget nasa's allocated for this and 408 00:15:49,910 --> 00:15:45,279 where is the funding coming from to 409 00:15:54,949 --> 00:15:51,829 go ahead dan this is dan evans i think i 410 00:15:56,150 --> 00:15:54,959 can answer that one so 411 00:15:58,949 --> 00:15:56,160 when we 412 00:16:01,269 --> 00:15:58,959 orchestrate studies like this it's no 413 00:16:03,110 --> 00:16:01,279 different to to any of the hundreds of 414 00:16:05,430 --> 00:16:03,120 review panels that we put together 415 00:16:07,110 --> 00:16:05,440 annually to to look at uh grant 416 00:16:09,829 --> 00:16:07,120 applications for instance 417 00:16:12,629 --> 00:16:09,839 uh nasa has the discretion of uh 418 00:16:14,310 --> 00:16:12,639 appointing these members but we do so um 419 00:16:16,790 --> 00:16:14,320 following wide consultation with the 420 00:16:19,350 --> 00:16:16,800 members of the community as to the the 421 00:16:21,749 --> 00:16:19,360 types of individuals who would serve in 422 00:16:23,189 --> 00:16:21,759 an incredible capacity on such a high 423 00:16:25,030 --> 00:16:23,199 profile team 424 00:16:27,110 --> 00:16:25,040 so it's our discretion 425 00:16:29,350 --> 00:16:27,120 but we will consult extremely widely 426 00:16:32,310 --> 00:16:29,360 let's speak about budget 427 00:16:35,749 --> 00:16:32,320 again this is very consistent with our 428 00:16:38,150 --> 00:16:35,759 standard grant review panels so a budget 429 00:16:39,910 --> 00:16:38,160 we would estimate anywhere between a few 430 00:16:45,670 --> 00:16:39,920 tens of thousands of dollars certainly 431 00:16:49,990 --> 00:16:47,430 all right thank you we'll take the next 432 00:16:54,629 --> 00:16:50,000 question 433 00:16:57,829 --> 00:16:54,639 with reuters you may go ahead 434 00:17:00,470 --> 00:16:57,839 hey thank you um question for dr zubukin 435 00:17:03,189 --> 00:17:00,480 um pentagon and nasa officials have 436 00:17:05,669 --> 00:17:03,199 talked about nasa's involvement 437 00:17:07,669 --> 00:17:05,679 in this uap kind of research effort in 438 00:17:10,230 --> 00:17:07,679 the past and i think when you and i 439 00:17:11,829 --> 00:17:10,240 actually talked about it like a year ago 440 00:17:13,669 --> 00:17:11,839 you said kind of nasa was looking into 441 00:17:15,429 --> 00:17:13,679 this and seeing how it could help uap 442 00:17:17,350 --> 00:17:15,439 efforts and kind of similar things that 443 00:17:19,990 --> 00:17:17,360 was announced today so i guess i'm just 444 00:17:22,870 --> 00:17:20,000 wondering why announce this now and what 445 00:17:25,029 --> 00:17:22,880 prompted plans to kind of form this 446 00:17:27,510 --> 00:17:25,039 study panel and and also what progress 447 00:17:32,950 --> 00:17:27,520 if any has nasa made in the uap effort 448 00:17:37,669 --> 00:17:35,110 the um 449 00:17:41,350 --> 00:17:37,679 department of defense kind of work 450 00:17:43,990 --> 00:17:41,360 is uh is clearly there and uh you know 451 00:17:45,590 --> 00:17:44,000 has drawn a lot of attention 452 00:17:47,350 --> 00:17:45,600 and it's always very hard kind of if you 453 00:17:49,990 --> 00:17:47,360 say hey that has nothing to do with what 454 00:17:52,070 --> 00:17:50,000 we're doing some somebody else you know 455 00:17:54,230 --> 00:17:52,080 said uh you know like hey was it your 456 00:17:56,230 --> 00:17:54,240 new boss uh you know the administrator 457 00:17:57,830 --> 00:17:56,240 nelson who made you do this and it's 458 00:17:59,430 --> 00:17:57,840 very hard to say it's like oh that had 459 00:18:01,909 --> 00:17:59,440 absolutely no influence of course it has 460 00:18:03,270 --> 00:18:01,919 influence but i want you to know that 461 00:18:06,710 --> 00:18:03,280 the major reason we're doing and we're 462 00:18:10,710 --> 00:18:06,720 doing it now is uh is because of the uh 463 00:18:13,029 --> 00:18:10,720 because of the science uh you know um uh 464 00:18:14,870 --> 00:18:13,039 interest and because of the safety kind 465 00:18:16,950 --> 00:18:14,880 of issues that relate to this airspace 466 00:18:18,470 --> 00:18:16,960 that uh that we think 467 00:18:20,549 --> 00:18:18,480 matters uh i 468 00:18:21,750 --> 00:18:20,559 mean you know as opposed to i mean if 469 00:18:24,230 --> 00:18:21,760 you could have done it a little bit 470 00:18:25,830 --> 00:18:24,240 earlier uh that that's perfectly fine 471 00:18:27,510 --> 00:18:25,840 but we really started thinking about 472 00:18:29,190 --> 00:18:27,520 this especially in the context of kind 473 00:18:32,070 --> 00:18:29,200 of the overall dialogue we've been 474 00:18:33,750 --> 00:18:32,080 working on this for a while uh really 475 00:18:34,630 --> 00:18:33,760 trying to make sure 476 00:18:38,549 --> 00:18:34,640 that 477 00:18:40,230 --> 00:18:38,559 did we set this up the right way because 478 00:18:42,630 --> 00:18:40,240 at the end you know kind of the quality 479 00:18:44,470 --> 00:18:42,640 of science investigations need to be the 480 00:18:47,430 --> 00:18:44,480 same no matter what we do and we will 481 00:18:49,190 --> 00:18:47,440 insist on it here also uh that the one 482 00:18:51,430 --> 00:18:49,200 difference of course between this and 483 00:18:52,789 --> 00:18:51,440 other agencies as we expect is to be 484 00:18:58,070 --> 00:18:52,799 entirely in the public domain which is 485 00:19:02,150 --> 00:18:59,750 all right thank you 486 00:19:04,310 --> 00:19:02,160 we'll go to the next question 487 00:19:07,830 --> 00:19:04,320 our next question is from marina corin 488 00:19:10,390 --> 00:19:07,840 with the atlantic you may go ahead 489 00:19:12,870 --> 00:19:10,400 hi everyone uh two questions for thomas 490 00:19:13,590 --> 00:19:12,880 um first to follow up on what joey asked 491 00:19:15,990 --> 00:19:13,600 um 492 00:19:18,710 --> 00:19:16,000 whose idea was it for nasa to establish 493 00:19:20,950 --> 00:19:18,720 this uap study team did it come from 494 00:19:23,750 --> 00:19:20,960 administrator nelson and he directed you 495 00:19:25,830 --> 00:19:23,760 to make these moves um and you also said 496 00:19:27,190 --> 00:19:25,840 that this effort lines up with nasa's 497 00:19:29,510 --> 00:19:27,200 air safety 498 00:19:30,950 --> 00:19:29,520 goals um why then is the team going to 499 00:19:32,630 --> 00:19:30,960 be housed in the science mission 500 00:19:35,029 --> 00:19:32,640 directorate and not for example the 501 00:19:37,270 --> 00:19:35,039 aeronautics research mission directorate 502 00:19:39,029 --> 00:19:37,280 thank you 503 00:19:40,549 --> 00:19:39,039 so you saw the administrator kind of 504 00:19:43,029 --> 00:19:40,559 directing me and 505 00:19:44,789 --> 00:19:43,039 uh in front of camera before that hey 506 00:19:46,070 --> 00:19:44,799 thomas you should deal with that his 507 00:19:48,549 --> 00:19:46,080 instinct is 508 00:19:50,789 --> 00:19:48,559 exactly right the science 509 00:19:54,230 --> 00:19:50,799 play the science uh discipline is where 510 00:19:57,270 --> 00:19:54,240 these questions should be addressed uh 511 00:19:59,669 --> 00:19:57,280 so but uh it is my decision to turn put 512 00:20:02,470 --> 00:19:59,679 this up i did not i was not asked by 513 00:20:05,110 --> 00:20:02,480 anybody to to do this or find this 514 00:20:07,669 --> 00:20:05,120 particular approach this is the way 515 00:20:10,070 --> 00:20:07,679 i believe this should be done to 516 00:20:12,870 --> 00:20:10,080 actually add to this discussion 517 00:20:14,149 --> 00:20:12,880 and uh it's a well-proof and frankly an 518 00:20:17,029 --> 00:20:14,159 uh 519 00:20:19,669 --> 00:20:17,039 an approach i've used before in multiple 520 00:20:22,310 --> 00:20:19,679 occasions to really go into a field and 521 00:20:25,270 --> 00:20:22,320 kind of tackle a problem that is 522 00:20:26,789 --> 00:20:25,280 that is very much kind of ambiguous kind 523 00:20:28,149 --> 00:20:26,799 of when you start so i think it's 524 00:20:30,549 --> 00:20:28,159 exactly the right 525 00:20:32,630 --> 00:20:30,559 way to go the fact that we uh you know 526 00:20:34,549 --> 00:20:32,640 get one of the best leaders i believe in 527 00:20:37,110 --> 00:20:34,559 the field really will make gift us a lot 528 00:20:39,510 --> 00:20:37,120 you know with david spurkle and dana and 529 00:20:43,270 --> 00:20:39,520 will really gives us a lot of credence 530 00:20:47,350 --> 00:20:45,110 all right this is down here i just uh 531 00:20:49,909 --> 00:20:47,360 quickly point out that you know this 532 00:20:52,310 --> 00:20:49,919 wasn't done in a vacuum we of course 533 00:20:54,149 --> 00:20:52,320 have consulted with our counterparts in 534 00:20:55,750 --> 00:20:54,159 aeronautics within nasa they've been 535 00:20:57,750 --> 00:20:55,760 absolutely tremendous 536 00:20:58,710 --> 00:20:57,760 in helping us stand up this and in the 537 00:21:00,470 --> 00:20:58,720 charge 538 00:21:02,149 --> 00:21:00,480 to the independent study team that 539 00:21:03,909 --> 00:21:02,159 thomas presented this morning at the 540 00:21:05,830 --> 00:21:03,919 national academy you can actually see 541 00:21:07,750 --> 00:21:05,840 that that there are numerous airspace 542 00:21:08,950 --> 00:21:07,760 safety charge elements in there that 543 00:21:10,710 --> 00:21:08,960 were directly introduced by our 544 00:21:13,510 --> 00:21:10,720 counterparts in aeronautics so you know 545 00:21:16,070 --> 00:21:13,520 we're doing this in lockstep with them 546 00:21:17,830 --> 00:21:16,080 yeah i'm really glad you said that uh 547 00:21:19,669 --> 00:21:17,840 dan you know you know the way we're 548 00:21:22,070 --> 00:21:19,679 organized and the disciplines there's 549 00:21:23,830 --> 00:21:22,080 multiple uh ways of organizing this but 550 00:21:26,070 --> 00:21:23,840 it kind of one organization needs to 551 00:21:27,590 --> 00:21:26,080 take charge of it and then uh what we've 552 00:21:29,029 --> 00:21:27,600 done in a number of cases look at the 553 00:21:32,149 --> 00:21:29,039 commercial lunar payload services 554 00:21:35,190 --> 00:21:32,159 there's basically four entities are are 555 00:21:37,750 --> 00:21:35,200 funding that we own it here uh there's 556 00:21:39,430 --> 00:21:37,760 other uh things that other entities are 557 00:21:42,149 --> 00:21:39,440 running for us you know some of the 558 00:21:44,630 --> 00:21:42,159 space station work is running over by 559 00:21:46,710 --> 00:21:44,640 kathy leaders uh organization but you 560 00:21:48,470 --> 00:21:46,720 know like we have a lot of science uh 561 00:21:51,350 --> 00:21:48,480 impacts the same is true with deep space 562 00:21:53,110 --> 00:21:51,360 network and others right so so just 563 00:21:54,470 --> 00:21:53,120 i don't think there's more message to it 564 00:21:56,630 --> 00:21:54,480 other than us trying to figure out 565 00:21:59,190 --> 00:21:56,640 where's the where's the central 566 00:22:00,870 --> 00:21:59,200 part of the investigation and kind of 567 00:22:02,870 --> 00:22:00,880 tipped in our favor 568 00:22:04,789 --> 00:22:02,880 the fact that the administrator kind of 569 00:22:07,750 --> 00:22:04,799 gave me the actions ernie also had an 570 00:22:12,950 --> 00:22:08,950 all right we'll go on to the next 571 00:22:18,470 --> 00:22:14,710 our next question is from michael sheets 572 00:22:20,710 --> 00:22:18,480 with cnbc you may go ahead 573 00:22:23,029 --> 00:22:20,720 hi everybody i'm curious about the 574 00:22:24,630 --> 00:22:23,039 existing resources and 575 00:22:27,750 --> 00:22:24,640 data sets 576 00:22:30,549 --> 00:22:27,760 databases across nasa 577 00:22:34,070 --> 00:22:30,559 who before now has been really you know 578 00:22:35,350 --> 00:22:34,080 in charge of collecting nasa's side of 579 00:22:36,950 --> 00:22:35,360 things obviously we talked a little bit 580 00:22:39,190 --> 00:22:36,960 about the pentagon task force that's 581 00:22:41,430 --> 00:22:39,200 been collecting data and just recently 582 00:22:44,149 --> 00:22:41,440 testified showing a couple of videos of 583 00:22:47,029 --> 00:22:44,159 uap instances but i'm curious about you 584 00:22:49,750 --> 00:22:47,039 know what you guys already know and 585 00:22:50,950 --> 00:22:49,760 maybe over the decades have collected of 586 00:22:52,870 --> 00:22:50,960 instances 587 00:22:55,190 --> 00:22:52,880 and uh maybe that the public wasn't 588 00:22:56,870 --> 00:22:55,200 aware of before 589 00:22:59,029 --> 00:22:56,880 i think i'm gonna i'm gonna get started 590 00:23:00,149 --> 00:22:59,039 and then i'm gonna kick it over to uh to 591 00:23:02,710 --> 00:23:00,159 dan 592 00:23:06,710 --> 00:23:02,720 uh i'm not aware of any systematic or 593 00:23:09,669 --> 00:23:06,720 even kind of uh kind of sporadic kind of 594 00:23:11,190 --> 00:23:09,679 examinations of nasa data uh with that 595 00:23:13,510 --> 00:23:11,200 in mind i'm sure there are some but i'm 596 00:23:15,990 --> 00:23:13,520 not aware of any certainly not at the 597 00:23:18,149 --> 00:23:16,000 level that came to my attention 598 00:23:19,029 --> 00:23:18,159 uh the way the way we have done this 599 00:23:20,630 --> 00:23:19,039 right 600 00:23:22,789 --> 00:23:20,640 of course what we're doing is with our 601 00:23:24,950 --> 00:23:22,799 20 plus assets that are in space and an 602 00:23:26,789 --> 00:23:24,960 increasing number of commercial partners 603 00:23:28,950 --> 00:23:26,799 we're looking at the earth in new ways 604 00:23:31,190 --> 00:23:28,960 and we're also looking the other way at 605 00:23:33,110 --> 00:23:31,200 the sky in new ways 606 00:23:34,390 --> 00:23:33,120 with assets that we have but also with 607 00:23:36,470 --> 00:23:34,400 assets of the national science 608 00:23:38,950 --> 00:23:36,480 foundation and others are putting up 609 00:23:40,390 --> 00:23:38,960 including uh commercial entities uh you 610 00:23:43,269 --> 00:23:40,400 know and then the question just really 611 00:23:45,669 --> 00:23:43,279 is how do we use uh technologies such as 612 00:23:48,230 --> 00:23:45,679 ai and ml and other technologies that by 613 00:23:50,710 --> 00:23:48,240 the way are a pi priority for us 614 00:23:53,430 --> 00:23:50,720 here to kind of really make progress and 615 00:23:55,750 --> 00:23:53,440 sifting through the data towards uh uh 616 00:23:58,710 --> 00:23:55,760 finding some of these uh kind of uh 617 00:24:00,870 --> 00:23:58,720 interesting uh uh you know events that 618 00:24:03,669 --> 00:24:00,880 uh uh you know have the characteristics 619 00:24:06,230 --> 00:24:03,679 of of uap so so the data are here kind 620 00:24:08,070 --> 00:24:06,240 of our respective organizations uh have 621 00:24:09,590 --> 00:24:08,080 them and have done it you know and you 622 00:24:10,870 --> 00:24:09,600 know the data are public so i really 623 00:24:12,630 --> 00:24:10,880 don't know 624 00:24:15,590 --> 00:24:12,640 whether other people 625 00:24:17,830 --> 00:24:15,600 use these data uh for their uh 626 00:24:19,669 --> 00:24:17,840 for their research i sure hope they are 627 00:24:21,669 --> 00:24:19,679 you know we're always very excited 628 00:24:23,350 --> 00:24:21,679 people pull down data 629 00:24:25,910 --> 00:24:23,360 and kind of investigate them at their 630 00:24:27,590 --> 00:24:25,920 own interest in mind 631 00:24:29,510 --> 00:24:27,600 [Music] 632 00:24:31,269 --> 00:24:29,520 yeah i'll just quickly add on that you 633 00:24:33,269 --> 00:24:31,279 know i don't think anybody at nasa has 634 00:24:35,029 --> 00:24:33,279 you know sort of systematically looked 635 00:24:37,350 --> 00:24:35,039 into uap's um 636 00:24:39,110 --> 00:24:37,360 in the past at least to my knowledge but 637 00:24:41,110 --> 00:24:39,120 i think that one of the things that this 638 00:24:43,909 --> 00:24:41,120 independent study will find is that 639 00:24:46,230 --> 00:24:43,919 there is an enormous wealth of data that 640 00:24:48,549 --> 00:24:46,240 is held in in public archives so it can 641 00:24:49,990 --> 00:24:48,559 be brought to bear upon this problem 642 00:24:52,310 --> 00:24:50,000 remember one of the things we're trying 643 00:24:55,269 --> 00:24:52,320 to do here again as tom has said is to 644 00:24:57,110 --> 00:24:55,279 turn what is ostensibly a data poor 645 00:24:59,430 --> 00:24:57,120 field into a data rich one and that's 646 00:25:01,350 --> 00:24:59,440 when we can really begin to tackle 647 00:25:02,789 --> 00:25:01,360 those interesting questions that are on 648 00:25:06,710 --> 00:25:02,799 the tips of everybody's tongues about 649 00:25:11,510 --> 00:25:08,310 all right thank you we'll move on to our 650 00:25:16,310 --> 00:25:13,510 our next question is from gaddy schwartz 651 00:25:18,070 --> 00:25:16,320 with nbc you may go ahead 652 00:25:20,789 --> 00:25:18,080 hey there just following up on that last 653 00:25:23,510 --> 00:25:20,799 question so uh just 654 00:25:26,630 --> 00:25:23,520 dovetailing nasa has tens of thousands 655 00:25:28,310 --> 00:25:26,640 of hours of video of spacecraft the 656 00:25:30,870 --> 00:25:28,320 international space station it can be 657 00:25:33,350 --> 00:25:30,880 argued that nasa's got more access to 658 00:25:35,830 --> 00:25:33,360 the public data looking up and looking 659 00:25:37,510 --> 00:25:35,840 down than any other public organization 660 00:25:39,350 --> 00:25:37,520 in the world so 661 00:25:41,909 --> 00:25:39,360 are we to understand that 662 00:25:43,909 --> 00:25:41,919 that you will be reviewing 663 00:25:44,950 --> 00:25:43,919 all that's accessible 664 00:25:47,990 --> 00:25:44,960 uh 665 00:25:51,029 --> 00:25:48,000 publicly within nasa as well as 666 00:25:53,190 --> 00:25:51,039 other public videos or or signals 667 00:25:55,029 --> 00:25:53,200 intelligence or whatever that may be and 668 00:25:58,630 --> 00:25:55,039 putting it in a study for a hundred 669 00:26:04,070 --> 00:26:01,110 okay i can answer that let's just dab 670 00:26:06,310 --> 00:26:04,080 this is no different to any scientific 671 00:26:08,070 --> 00:26:06,320 investigation that we would on to 672 00:26:10,230 --> 00:26:08,080 undertake and the first one the first 673 00:26:13,190 --> 00:26:10,240 step in any of those investigations is 674 00:26:14,549 --> 00:26:13,200 to figure out what data is at hand 675 00:26:16,710 --> 00:26:14,559 that's step one 676 00:26:19,750 --> 00:26:16,720 this is all this study is doing is to 677 00:26:21,350 --> 00:26:19,760 figure out what data one might use to 678 00:26:24,230 --> 00:26:21,360 interrogate better 679 00:26:26,470 --> 00:26:24,240 uat okay we're not actually going to be 680 00:26:28,230 --> 00:26:26,480 certain within that budget uh analyzing 681 00:26:30,230 --> 00:26:28,240 those data directly this is just step 682 00:26:37,029 --> 00:26:30,240 one what data are out there that could 683 00:26:40,789 --> 00:26:38,390 all right we'll move on to the next 684 00:26:43,269 --> 00:26:40,799 question oh sorry with anything more oh 685 00:26:44,870 --> 00:26:43,279 yeah yeah just just uh so just to 686 00:26:46,549 --> 00:26:44,880 clarify 687 00:26:49,510 --> 00:26:46,559 so what what will that be so there will 688 00:26:51,909 --> 00:26:49,520 be no determination on whether 689 00:26:52,950 --> 00:26:51,919 this is prosaic or something else it'll 690 00:26:54,470 --> 00:26:52,960 just be 691 00:26:57,830 --> 00:26:54,480 basically what we've kind of seen from 692 00:27:00,710 --> 00:26:57,840 the dod which is uh we have you know 200 693 00:27:02,950 --> 00:27:00,720 and some cases or or such and such many 694 00:27:05,190 --> 00:27:02,960 cases of unexpected phenomenon is that 695 00:27:07,110 --> 00:27:05,200 is that what the the final products or 696 00:27:09,669 --> 00:27:07,120 the final first product may look like at 697 00:27:11,750 --> 00:27:09,679 the end of this study 698 00:27:13,350 --> 00:27:11,760 why don't i take that one 699 00:27:14,789 --> 00:27:13,360 my guess is to define a product and 700 00:27:17,350 --> 00:27:14,799 frankly i want to kick it over to dave 701 00:27:20,070 --> 00:27:17,360 in just a sec here but what that what i 702 00:27:22,630 --> 00:27:20,080 expect the final product to look like is 703 00:27:25,590 --> 00:27:22,640 to really address the questions uh that 704 00:27:28,230 --> 00:27:25,600 relate to what are the data we should be 705 00:27:30,870 --> 00:27:28,240 looking at how should we doing that are 706 00:27:33,029 --> 00:27:30,880 there data we should uh get that with 707 00:27:35,669 --> 00:27:33,039 that are not uh that are not currently 708 00:27:38,310 --> 00:27:35,679 there so it's much more kind of uh that 709 00:27:40,789 --> 00:27:38,320 the output from this particular study is 710 00:27:43,269 --> 00:27:40,799 not to sift through all the data and do 711 00:27:45,830 --> 00:27:43,279 all this research it's to kind of make a 712 00:27:48,149 --> 00:27:45,840 proposal for a research program that we 713 00:27:49,909 --> 00:27:48,159 can then implement based on uh the 714 00:27:52,950 --> 00:27:49,919 inputs and the principles that are there 715 00:27:54,389 --> 00:27:52,960 dave i'll kick it to you 716 00:27:56,310 --> 00:27:54,399 yeah i mean i just 717 00:27:58,870 --> 00:27:56,320 just to reinforce what thomas said i 718 00:28:01,190 --> 00:27:58,880 think we will end up probably saying 719 00:28:02,950 --> 00:28:01,200 look here's the data we have usually 720 00:28:05,350 --> 00:28:02,960 when you do that you then reach the 721 00:28:07,510 --> 00:28:05,360 conclusion that well the data we have is 722 00:28:08,710 --> 00:28:07,520 okay but if only we took the data 723 00:28:11,190 --> 00:28:08,720 differently 724 00:28:12,950 --> 00:28:11,200 you know observed from above and below a 725 00:28:14,310 --> 00:28:12,960 certain region of the sky at the same 726 00:28:16,149 --> 00:28:14,320 time for example 727 00:28:18,470 --> 00:28:16,159 without having done the analysis i don't 728 00:28:20,870 --> 00:28:18,480 know what it'll look like but 729 00:28:23,669 --> 00:28:20,880 ways of observing the future 730 00:28:26,230 --> 00:28:23,679 that might give much more insight 731 00:28:27,430 --> 00:28:26,240 ways of analysis in the future 732 00:28:30,070 --> 00:28:27,440 you know uh 733 00:28:32,310 --> 00:28:30,080 you know thomas mentioned ai and ml we 734 00:28:35,269 --> 00:28:32,320 now have a lot of methodologies that are 735 00:28:37,830 --> 00:28:35,279 effective at finding anomalous events 736 00:28:42,230 --> 00:28:37,840 finding fast moving objects finding 737 00:28:47,430 --> 00:28:45,110 i'm imagining we will end up pointing it 738 00:28:48,389 --> 00:28:47,440 perhaps in future directions 739 00:28:50,470 --> 00:28:48,399 that 740 00:28:53,110 --> 00:28:50,480 nasa may want to consider 741 00:28:54,950 --> 00:28:53,120 uh future stuff you know we will 742 00:28:57,350 --> 00:28:54,960 hopefully at least 743 00:29:01,510 --> 00:28:57,360 lay out some of the roadmap of how we 744 00:29:08,310 --> 00:29:03,909 great thank you so much we will move on 745 00:29:12,389 --> 00:29:10,310 and our next question is from kenneth 746 00:29:13,830 --> 00:29:12,399 chang with the new york times you may go 747 00:29:15,590 --> 00:29:13,840 ahead 748 00:29:17,669 --> 00:29:15,600 thank you all right this is for thomas 749 00:29:19,510 --> 00:29:17,679 so i was wondering now that nasa has 750 00:29:21,269 --> 00:29:19,520 sort of openly 751 00:29:23,909 --> 00:29:21,279 to the possibility that it could be 752 00:29:25,430 --> 00:29:23,919 intelligent aliens visiting earth what 753 00:29:27,350 --> 00:29:25,440 are the prospects that nasa could get 754 00:29:29,669 --> 00:29:27,360 back into business looking for 755 00:29:31,669 --> 00:29:29,679 alien intelligence in the universe um 756 00:29:33,909 --> 00:29:31,679 nasa hasn't has done hardly any study 757 00:29:36,310 --> 00:29:33,919 work for decades and a lot of it was 758 00:29:38,470 --> 00:29:36,320 because of skepticism from congress but 759 00:29:40,389 --> 00:29:38,480 it seems congress seems to be more open 760 00:29:43,590 --> 00:29:40,399 to that now 761 00:29:48,470 --> 00:29:46,950 look i mean i have we have done work 762 00:29:52,149 --> 00:29:48,480 on uh 763 00:29:54,549 --> 00:29:52,159 both looking at kind of uh the sky at a 764 00:29:56,310 --> 00:29:54,559 variety of wavelength ranges but also 765 00:29:58,310 --> 00:29:56,320 looking for techno signatures that 766 00:29:59,590 --> 00:29:58,320 aren't currently funding those research 767 00:30:03,350 --> 00:29:59,600 projects 768 00:30:05,110 --> 00:30:03,360 and uh so so yes it is true that uh 769 00:30:07,669 --> 00:30:05,120 kind of there was a period where perhaps 770 00:30:10,310 --> 00:30:07,679 that was less abundant but uh now we've 771 00:30:13,029 --> 00:30:10,320 deliberately included that into our 772 00:30:14,630 --> 00:30:13,039 research portfolio so i'm not aware of 773 00:30:16,630 --> 00:30:14,640 kind of research we're artificially 774 00:30:18,630 --> 00:30:16,640 stifling from one or the other side what 775 00:30:20,549 --> 00:30:18,640 we're really trying to do here though 776 00:30:23,350 --> 00:30:20,559 is start the investigation without an 777 00:30:26,310 --> 00:30:23,360 outcome in mind uh you know really being 778 00:30:27,669 --> 00:30:26,320 open to many different options uh you 779 00:30:30,630 --> 00:30:27,679 know i think david 780 00:30:33,350 --> 00:30:30,640 sparkle said it well right kind of uh 781 00:30:35,750 --> 00:30:33,360 being aware that multiple 782 00:30:36,549 --> 00:30:35,760 sources of explanations could be there 783 00:30:38,950 --> 00:30:36,559 but 784 00:30:41,269 --> 00:30:38,960 i'm not aware of any guidance that that 785 00:30:41,990 --> 00:30:41,279 i have or that i've implemented 786 00:30:48,789 --> 00:30:42,000 that 787 00:30:53,110 --> 00:30:51,830 and and can i we have just a hand we do 788 00:30:54,870 --> 00:30:53,120 have some uh things that have been 789 00:30:57,750 --> 00:30:54,880 funded on techno signatures if you want 790 00:30:59,750 --> 00:30:57,760 me to follow up with you on that uh our 791 00:31:01,909 --> 00:30:59,760 our one set of guidances is always from 792 00:31:05,669 --> 00:31:01,919 space observations because that is what 793 00:31:10,230 --> 00:31:05,679 we do so we don't we don't fund from 794 00:31:14,389 --> 00:31:11,669 but if nothing else on that we can move 795 00:31:17,669 --> 00:31:15,909 our next question is from andrea 796 00:31:20,230 --> 00:31:17,679 leinfelder with the houston chronicle 797 00:31:22,710 --> 00:31:20,240 you may go ahead 798 00:31:24,389 --> 00:31:22,720 hi um this is following up a little bit 799 00:31:25,990 --> 00:31:24,399 on um 800 00:31:27,750 --> 00:31:26,000 on just how 801 00:31:29,269 --> 00:31:27,760 uaps has been observed thus far so you 802 00:31:31,669 --> 00:31:29,279 know a lot of the dod observation 803 00:31:33,350 --> 00:31:31,679 release have been from naval aviators 804 00:31:34,470 --> 00:31:33,360 and so david i'm always wondering if you 805 00:31:35,909 --> 00:31:34,480 could just 806 00:31:37,269 --> 00:31:35,919 talk a little bit about what the study 807 00:31:39,350 --> 00:31:37,279 you said might be 808 00:31:41,110 --> 00:31:39,360 telescopes or satellites do you know 809 00:31:43,430 --> 00:31:41,120 these have been used before to spot any 810 00:31:44,789 --> 00:31:43,440 of these uaps and i know part of this is 811 00:31:46,470 --> 00:31:44,799 figuring out how to collect that in the 812 00:31:48,870 --> 00:31:46,480 future but if you could just talk to how 813 00:31:51,909 --> 00:31:48,880 maybe we're looking at things other than 814 00:31:52,710 --> 00:31:51,919 just naval aviators thank you 815 00:31:54,549 --> 00:31:52,720 um 816 00:31:57,350 --> 00:31:54,559 as far as i know 817 00:31:59,909 --> 00:31:57,360 um and do i expect to learn more as a 818 00:32:01,669 --> 00:31:59,919 study goes forward i do not know of any 819 00:32:02,870 --> 00:32:01,679 systematic study to do that with 820 00:32:04,310 --> 00:32:02,880 graduates 821 00:32:07,110 --> 00:32:04,320 you know either 822 00:32:10,389 --> 00:32:07,120 ground-based telescopes looking up uh 823 00:32:21,350 --> 00:32:10,399 atmospheric observations or 824 00:32:24,789 --> 00:32:23,269 there's actually a wealth of data that 825 00:32:30,630 --> 00:32:24,799 we have collected 826 00:32:35,029 --> 00:32:32,230 all right thank you 827 00:32:37,350 --> 00:32:35,039 moving on to the next question 828 00:32:40,470 --> 00:32:37,360 our next question is from miriam cramer 829 00:32:42,710 --> 00:32:40,480 with axios you may go ahead 830 00:32:45,110 --> 00:32:42,720 hi this question is for uh 831 00:32:47,350 --> 00:32:45,120 thomas and david i think um 832 00:32:49,269 --> 00:32:47,360 do you think that uaps should be 833 00:32:51,350 --> 00:32:49,279 discussed in the same breath as other 834 00:32:52,950 --> 00:32:51,360 more mainstream scientific searches for 835 00:32:54,950 --> 00:32:52,960 life in the universe whether it be you 836 00:32:57,110 --> 00:32:54,960 know looking for microbes on mars 837 00:33:00,389 --> 00:32:57,120 or techno signatures 838 00:33:00,399 --> 00:33:03,990 i'll let you go david 839 00:33:07,110 --> 00:33:06,149 yeah i would group them 840 00:33:08,710 --> 00:33:07,120 more 841 00:33:11,029 --> 00:33:08,720 at this point 842 00:33:13,110 --> 00:33:11,039 with um 843 00:33:15,509 --> 00:33:13,120 when you're looking for life on mars you 844 00:33:17,669 --> 00:33:15,519 know what you're in a sense you start 845 00:33:19,909 --> 00:33:17,679 out with a hypothesis that you want to 846 00:33:21,669 --> 00:33:19,919 test and you start out with a modeling 847 00:33:23,669 --> 00:33:21,679 morning test 848 00:33:26,389 --> 00:33:23,679 the approach i think we want to take 849 00:33:29,269 --> 00:33:26,399 here is a different one this is a 850 00:33:31,110 --> 00:33:29,279 phenomenon we don't understand 851 00:33:33,269 --> 00:33:31,120 and we want to collect more data on the 852 00:33:34,070 --> 00:33:33,279 phenomenon i don't think we want to go 853 00:33:35,269 --> 00:33:34,080 in 854 00:33:37,830 --> 00:33:35,279 um 855 00:33:40,950 --> 00:33:37,840 with particular hypotheses coming into 856 00:33:44,950 --> 00:33:43,269 yeah i i agree with this i kind of i 857 00:33:47,669 --> 00:33:44,960 want to say because 858 00:33:49,830 --> 00:33:47,679 in my kind of scientific lifetimes you 859 00:33:51,509 --> 00:33:49,840 know some of these uh night glowing 860 00:33:55,029 --> 00:33:51,519 clouds that were 861 00:33:56,789 --> 00:33:55,039 that were frankly hypothesized of being 862 00:33:59,110 --> 00:33:56,799 kind of uh you know having very 863 00:34:01,509 --> 00:33:59,120 different origins that we now know they 864 00:34:02,950 --> 00:34:01,519 have kind of was a kind of analogy of 865 00:34:05,909 --> 00:34:02,960 that kind of uh 866 00:34:07,990 --> 00:34:05,919 an event a serie a phenomena that has 867 00:34:10,550 --> 00:34:08,000 certain characteristics and kind of by 868 00:34:12,950 --> 00:34:10,560 bringing data to bear and eventually 869 00:34:14,950 --> 00:34:12,960 models could be explained uh you know so 870 00:34:17,430 --> 00:34:14,960 so it really is it's more that again to 871 00:34:19,510 --> 00:34:17,440 get to that answer multiple 872 00:34:22,069 --> 00:34:19,520 routes of investigation were pursued and 873 00:34:23,589 --> 00:34:22,079 multiple hypotheses were put forward and 874 00:34:26,310 --> 00:34:23,599 at the end it turned out to be a really 875 00:34:28,470 --> 00:34:26,320 beautiful uh set of science uh going 876 00:34:29,990 --> 00:34:28,480 forward so yes it really is kind of a 877 00:34:34,310 --> 00:34:30,000 slightly different 878 00:34:35,349 --> 00:34:34,320 approach that is very common in science 879 00:34:37,270 --> 00:34:35,359 right sometimes you just don't 880 00:34:40,869 --> 00:34:37,280 understand something and you start 881 00:34:42,869 --> 00:34:40,879 poking at it from multiple directions 882 00:34:44,629 --> 00:34:42,879 great um we've got gorgeous pictures of 883 00:34:46,310 --> 00:34:44,639 those noctilucent clouds that thomas 884 00:34:49,190 --> 00:34:46,320 just mentioned if everybody's interested 885 00:34:52,629 --> 00:34:49,200 i'll pass them along too 886 00:34:54,310 --> 00:34:52,639 we can go on to the next question 887 00:34:58,390 --> 00:34:54,320 our next question is from mike wahl with 888 00:35:02,310 --> 00:35:00,310 thank you guys um yeah this one's 889 00:35:04,630 --> 00:35:02,320 probably for dr z do you hope one of the 890 00:35:06,950 --> 00:35:04,640 outcomes of this study is to kind of 891 00:35:08,390 --> 00:35:06,960 normalize this this sort of research 892 00:35:10,310 --> 00:35:08,400 program going forward you know taking 893 00:35:11,990 --> 00:35:10,320 something that might be a little outrage 894 00:35:13,910 --> 00:35:12,000 but bringing it more into the mainstream 895 00:35:16,069 --> 00:35:13,920 and giving like kind of masses and 896 00:35:17,589 --> 00:35:16,079 primitive to that will bring more people 897 00:35:19,910 --> 00:35:17,599 into the study i mean is that one of the 898 00:35:21,910 --> 00:35:19,920 outcomes that you hope to achieve is to 899 00:35:23,109 --> 00:35:21,920 is to kind of like normalize this sort 900 00:35:24,950 --> 00:35:23,119 of thinking 901 00:35:26,790 --> 00:35:24,960 going forward 902 00:35:29,030 --> 00:35:26,800 one of the outcomes of the study for me 903 00:35:31,349 --> 00:35:29,040 would be to kind of 904 00:35:33,829 --> 00:35:31,359 communicate to everybody uh whether it's 905 00:35:35,589 --> 00:35:33,839 our own community and and more broadly 906 00:35:37,910 --> 00:35:35,599 that the science process is a valid 907 00:35:41,030 --> 00:35:37,920 process for any and all problems 908 00:35:42,470 --> 00:35:41,040 including that one so so for me 909 00:35:44,470 --> 00:35:42,480 so i turn it on its head do you see what 910 00:35:46,470 --> 00:35:44,480 i'm saying i mean i i just really 911 00:35:48,310 --> 00:35:46,480 believe that uh 912 00:35:51,030 --> 00:35:48,320 these kind of processes that that we 913 00:35:53,190 --> 00:35:51,040 that have proven to be so transformative 914 00:35:55,430 --> 00:35:53,200 for how we understand our universe are 915 00:35:58,310 --> 00:35:55,440 very much useful including for those 916 00:36:00,069 --> 00:35:58,320 problems 917 00:36:01,750 --> 00:36:00,079 okay great thank you 918 00:36:03,829 --> 00:36:01,760 and we have time for only one more 919 00:36:06,390 --> 00:36:03,839 question today uh for those we don't get 920 00:36:08,790 --> 00:36:06,400 to uh do feel free to reach out directly 921 00:36:10,230 --> 00:36:08,800 to me karen boxer to the newsroom 922 00:36:12,790 --> 00:36:10,240 and we will try to get your questions 923 00:36:16,150 --> 00:36:12,800 answered but we have one more question 924 00:36:17,430 --> 00:36:16,160 so i'll toss to you holly for that 925 00:36:19,670 --> 00:36:17,440 thank you our next question is from 926 00:36:21,670 --> 00:36:19,680 irene cloth with aviation week you may 927 00:36:23,670 --> 00:36:21,680 go ahead 928 00:36:27,109 --> 00:36:23,680 thanks very much um i think this is 929 00:36:29,670 --> 00:36:27,119 probably for uh dr spurgle 930 00:36:32,870 --> 00:36:29,680 as the study group leader will you have 931 00:36:34,390 --> 00:36:32,880 access to classified information and if 932 00:36:37,670 --> 00:36:34,400 not 933 00:36:41,750 --> 00:36:37,680 how will that limit the scope of what 934 00:36:47,030 --> 00:36:44,630 i do not have classified clearance and 935 00:36:50,230 --> 00:36:47,040 we want this to be an open study 936 00:36:51,910 --> 00:36:50,240 so what we will rely on is 937 00:36:55,030 --> 00:36:51,920 some members of the community will have 938 00:36:56,710 --> 00:36:55,040 clearances if we need some insights we 939 00:36:58,870 --> 00:36:56,720 can obtain them i hope 940 00:37:01,190 --> 00:36:58,880 but mostly i think we will be trying to 941 00:37:04,710 --> 00:37:01,200 see what we can learn 942 00:37:06,310 --> 00:37:04,720 from the open data as 943 00:37:07,270 --> 00:37:06,320 we've mentioned already i think there's 944 00:37:09,670 --> 00:37:07,280 actually 945 00:37:12,069 --> 00:37:09,680 likely a lot of information 946 00:37:14,630 --> 00:37:12,079 in the open data that has not been 947 00:37:19,510 --> 00:37:14,640 looked at yet not been used and we can 948 00:37:24,310 --> 00:37:19,520 use um open processes uh for uh 949 00:37:28,310 --> 00:37:26,230 this is dan if i may quickly add on to 950 00:37:30,710 --> 00:37:28,320 that you know what one of the things 951 00:37:32,470 --> 00:37:30,720 that we aim to do by setting up this 952 00:37:35,349 --> 00:37:32,480 study is is to acknowledge that there's 953 00:37:38,390 --> 00:37:35,359 been a lot of work done in the dod um 954 00:37:40,390 --> 00:37:38,400 realm about this already but see what we 955 00:37:42,310 --> 00:37:40,400 can contribute using the tools of 956 00:37:44,790 --> 00:37:42,320 science and so it's extremely important 957 00:37:47,510 --> 00:37:44,800 to us that this remain a fully 958 00:37:50,230 --> 00:37:47,520 transparent open and therefore 959 00:37:52,710 --> 00:37:50,240 unclassified study right we want the 960 00:37:54,390 --> 00:37:52,720 report to be published in full in its 961 00:37:56,630 --> 00:37:54,400 entirety we're going to be having public 962 00:37:59,430 --> 00:37:56,640 meetings about this too um and so that 963 00:38:01,589 --> 00:37:59,440 necessitates uh that it be unclassified 964 00:38:03,589 --> 00:38:01,599 and i think we've learned over the 965 00:38:05,910 --> 00:38:03,599 course of these 40 minutes yeah there's 966 00:38:07,510 --> 00:38:05,920 a great wealth of data out there 967 00:38:10,069 --> 00:38:07,520 that we can use already so i don't 968 00:38:15,190 --> 00:38:10,079 really see the need to to to partition 969 00:38:18,630 --> 00:38:17,030 thank you so much dan and did you 970 00:38:20,710 --> 00:38:18,640 address what you wanted to off of the 971 00:38:23,270 --> 00:38:20,720 last last person's question as well or 972 00:38:25,349 --> 00:38:23,280 did you want to add in 973 00:38:26,870 --> 00:38:25,359 i'll just quickly say that um 974 00:38:28,710 --> 00:38:26,880 one of the things you may have heard in 975 00:38:30,790 --> 00:38:28,720 the congressional hearings uh 976 00:38:34,310 --> 00:38:30,800 a few weeks ago was that there is a 977 00:38:37,510 --> 00:38:34,320 great deal of stigma associated with uap 978 00:38:40,150 --> 00:38:37,520 among our uh naval aviators and aviation 979 00:38:42,550 --> 00:38:40,160 communities um one of the things that we 980 00:38:44,710 --> 00:38:42,560 tangentially hope to do as part of this 981 00:38:46,870 --> 00:38:44,720 study simply by talking about it in the 982 00:38:49,510 --> 00:38:46,880 open is to help to remove some of the 983 00:38:51,670 --> 00:38:49,520 stigma uh associated with it and you 984 00:38:54,150 --> 00:38:51,680 know that will yield obviously uh 985 00:38:56,069 --> 00:38:54,160 increased access to to data more reports 986 00:38:57,750 --> 00:38:56,079 more sightings etc so 987 00:39:01,430 --> 00:38:57,760 that's another um thing that we're 988 00:39:03,270 --> 00:39:01,440 trying to accomplish with us 989 00:39:04,950 --> 00:39:03,280 great well thank you so much there was a 990 00:39:06,550 --> 00:39:04,960 lot of interest today and i am sorry we 991 00:39:09,270 --> 00:39:06,560 could not get to everybody's questions 992 00:39:10,630 --> 00:39:09,280 um but we had uh this was fit in quickly 993 00:39:11,910 --> 00:39:10,640 around people's schedules we were not